Even at the best possible quality, vertical banding simply ruins the image, making it one of the worst photo printers we’ve seen. Whereas the more expensive X produced overly light images, images scanned by the X are much more balanced. Be aware without a care! Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. There are still some poor design choices — when changing printer inks, the support that holds up the printer’s upper half must be manually readjusted in order to fit back into its slot.
|Date Added:||25 February 2005|
|File Size:||41.43 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Colours and flesh tones are generally accurate, and the multifunction can scan clean text for later copying or OCR processing. Graphics documents are even slower, printing at 8.
Quality is not stunning, either. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work. Adding background highlights in graphical documents make text much messier, with inconsistent background colours and some horizontal banding.
Print speeds are horrible — mono text documents will print at 12 page per minute using draft quality and 8.
Would you buy this?
Given the consumable efficiency of this printer, it seems more logical to shell out for a brand new printer rather than have to refill the cartridges on the X Whereas the more expensive X produced overly light images, images scanned by the X are much more balanced. Unlike most budget printers, the X is surprisingly sturdy. There are still some poor design choices — when changing printer inks, the support that holds up the printer’s upper half must be manually readjusted in order to fit back into its slot.
Lexmark X Specs – CNET
The use of a rear paper tray rather than a front one is also a pity, as it means the printer takes up more space. Pros Cheap, surprisingly sturdy, decent scan quality. Its price point may appeal to those looking for a cheap printer, but poor speed and print quality, and expensive inks make this a multifunction that’s easy to pass by. Scanning does offer some consolation. Although it still has a very plastic and cheap feel to it, its hinges don’t seem as fragile as some others we’ve seen.
But for everyone who expects at least average quality from their devices, keep moving. I need power and lots of it.
Cons Incredibly expensive inks, poor print quality, slow printing speeds. The appeal of the X’s initial price point is quickly diminished by its running costs. Text is largely clear and tidy, if a little faded. It has no card reader, and its PC-less functions are limited to simple copying and lexmwrk image scans.
While lexmakr don’t expect laser speeds from a budget multifunction, these results are inadequate; only Epson’s budget counterpart Stylus CX has worse speeds. A single character LED screen serves the sole purpose of indicating the number of copies made. Speed and quality are both substandard, but might suffice for urgent printing. Photo printing shows marginally better results, with a lwxmark 4x6in photo printing in 32sec, and A4 photos taking 1min 32sec.
Given the c per page achieved by most of its competitors, the X is unappealing.
Make Your Selection
Sign in with LinkedIn Sign in with Facebook. Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate.
For the most part, the X is a cheap x6250 dirty multifunction that serves no purpose other than to provide an emergency option in times of printing crisis. Even at the best possible quality, vertical banding simply ruins the image, making it one of the worst photo printers we’ve seen.
The multifunction will cost an average of Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category. Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more. Be aware without a care! Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected.
If you can afford the price lexmqrk, it is well worth the money.